GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Reed vs Woodson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ReedWinner
84.5

Reed wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Woodson
83.2

Woodson wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/ed-reed-vs-charles-woodson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ed Reed
84.5

Reed leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. 64 interceptions, a Super Bowl ring and the smartest free safety ever.

1. Ed Reed
84.5
2. Charles Woodson
83.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Ed Reed5 seasons played · career day 1,82527 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Charles Woodson5 seasons played · career day 1,82523 touchdowns
-14.8% vs Reed at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Reed005122754
🇺🇸 Woodson00592335

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricReedRetiredWoodsonRetired
Super Bowl titles11
Defensive Player of the Year1
Interceptions64
Pro Bowls99
All-Pro First Teams5
Interception return yards1,590
Defensive Player of the Year awards1
Career interceptions65
Defensive touchdowns13
Dominance w25%8278
Peak w20%8886
Longevity w20%8288
Honours w20%8480
Statistics w15%8886

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Reed84.5
Woodson83.2
The people
Reed
Woodson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Reed vs Woodson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →