Who is better, Cheever or Button?
Eddie Cheever leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Jenson Button — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Eddie Cheever above Jenson Button: 76.9 vs 76.8. Eddie Cheever leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics. Jenson Button leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cheever wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Button wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/eddie-cheever-vs-jenson-button
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cheever leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cheever | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 58 |
| 🇬🇧 Button | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CheeverRetired | ButtonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Indianapolis 500 wins | 1 | — |
| Formula 1 podiums | 9 | — |
| Grand Prix starts | 132 | — |
| Career F1 points | 70 | — |
| Seasons in top-level racing | 20 | — |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 15 |
| Podiums | — | 50 |
| Pole positions | — | 8 |
| Race starts | — | 306 |
| Fastest laps | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Eddie Cheever leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Jenson Button — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Button scores higher on dominance, honours. Cheever leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cheever: 76.9, Button: 76.8.
Make your case for Cheever vs Button. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.