Who is better, Giacomin or Robinson?
Eddie Giacomin leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Larry Robinson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Eddie Giacomin above Larry Robinson: 86.4 vs 86.3. Eddie Giacomin leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Larry Robinson leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Giacomin wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Robinson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/eddie-giacomin-vs-larry-robinson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Giacomin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Giacomin | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 340 | 678 |
| 🇨🇦 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 105 | 453 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GiacominRetired | RobinsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Vezina Trophies | 1 | — |
| Career shutouts | 54 | — |
| Career wins | 289 | — |
| All-star selections | 5 | — |
| Games played | 610 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 6 |
| Norris Trophies | — | 2 |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 958 |
| Playoff appearances | — | 20 |
| Plus-minus record | — | 730 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 84 |
Eddie Giacomin leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Larry Robinson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Robinson scores higher on honours, longevity. Giacomin leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Giacomin: 86.4, Robinson: 86.3.
Make your case for Giacomin vs Robinson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.