Who is better, Shore or Fredrickson?
Eddie Shore leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Frank Fredrickson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Eddie Shore and Frank Fredrickson level at 87.0. Eddie Shore leads on Dominance, Longevity. Frank Fredrickson leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Shore wins: Dominance, Longevity
Fredrickson wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/eddie-shore-vs-frank-fredrickson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Shore leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Shore | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 178 |
| 🇨🇦 Fredrickson | 0 | 0 | 60 | 156 | 331 | 671 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShoreRetired | FredricksonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Hart Trophies | 4 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 2 | — |
| First-team All-Star selections | 7 | — |
| Career points | 284 | — |
| NHL games played | 550 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Goals at the 1920 Olympics | — | 12 |
| Career NHL points | — | 78 |
| Seasons played | — | 11 |
| Western league scoring titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Eddie Shore leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Frank Fredrickson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fredrickson scores higher on statistics. Shore leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shore: 87.0, Fredrickson: 87.0.
Make your case for Shore vs Fredrickson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.