Who is better, Laprade or Zetterberg?
Edgar Laprade leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.1 for Henrik Zetterberg — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Edgar Laprade above Henrik Zetterberg: 82.3 vs 82.1. Edgar Laprade leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Henrik Zetterberg leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Laprade wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Zetterberg wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/edgar-laprade-vs-henrik-zetterberg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Laprade leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Laprade | 0 | 0 | 93 | 181 | 412 | 647 |
| 🇸🇪 Zetterberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 405 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LapradeRetired | ZetterbergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Calder Trophies | 1 | — |
| Lady Byng Trophies | 1 | — |
| Career points | 388 | — |
| Games played | 500 | 1,082 |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 1 |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | — | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 960 |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Edgar Laprade leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.1 for Henrik Zetterberg — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zetterberg scores higher on honours, longevity. Laprade leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Laprade: 82.3, Zetterberg: 82.1.
Make your case for Laprade vs Zetterberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.