Who is better, Martínez or Clarkson?
Edgar Martínez leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.1 for John Clarkson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Edgar Martínez above John Clarkson: 88.2 vs 88.1. Edgar Martínez leads on Longevity, Statistics. John Clarkson leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Martínez wins: Longevity, Statistics
Clarkson wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/edgar-martinez-vs-john-clarkson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Martínez leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇷 Martínez | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.609 | 1.83 |
| 🇺🇸 Clarkson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 245 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MartínezRetired | ClarksonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Batting titles | 2 | — |
| Career batting average | 0.312 | — |
| All-Star selections | 7 | — |
| Career on-base percentage | 0.418 | — |
| Silver Sluggers | 5 | — |
| Career wins | — | 328 |
| Best season wins | — | 53 |
| Career strikeouts | — | 1,978 |
| Career ERA | — | 2.81 |
| Career complete games | — | 485 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Edgar Martínez leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.1 for John Clarkson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Clarkson scores higher on peak, dominance. Martínez leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Martínez: 88.2, Clarkson: 88.1.
Make your case for Martínez vs Clarkson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.