Who is better, McColgan or Afrifa?
Eilish McColgan leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.6 for Elvis Afrifa — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Eilish McColgan and Elvis Afrifa level at 76.6. Eilish McColgan leads on Dominance, Peak, Longevity. Elvis Afrifa leads on Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McColgan wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity
Afrifa wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/eilish-mccolgan-vs-elvis-afrifa
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McColgan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 McColgan | 0 | 0 | 56 | 116 | 324 | 642 |
| 🇳🇱 Afrifa | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 670 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McColganActive | AfrifaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Games golds | 1 | — |
| European Championship golds | 1 | — |
| British records set | 6 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| British record 10,000 m | 30.19 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 1 |
| World Relays medals | — | 1 |
| Dutch titles | — | 2 |
| Personal best 100 m (s) | — | 10.12 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 82 |
Eilish McColgan leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.6 for Elvis Afrifa — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Afrifa scores higher on honours, statistics. McColgan leads on peak, dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McColgan: 76.6, Afrifa: 76.6.
Make your case for McColgan vs Afrifa. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.