Who is better, McColgan or Bennett?
Orlando Bennett leads with a GOAT score of 77.1 against 76.6 for Eilish McColgan — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Orlando Bennett above Eilish McColgan: 77.1 vs 76.6. Orlando Bennett leads on Statistics, Honours. Eilish McColgan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bennett wins: Honours, Statistics
McColgan wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/eilish-mccolgan-vs-orlando-bennett
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bennett leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 McColgan | 0 | 0 | 56 | 116 | 324 | 642 |
| 🇯🇲 Bennett | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 313 | 655 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McColganActive | BennettActive |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Games golds | 1 | — |
| European Championship golds | 1 | — |
| British records set | 6 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| British record 10,000 m | 30.19 | — |
| Jamaican titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 2 |
| Personal best (s) | — | 13.11 |
| NACAC medals | — | 1 |
| Diamond League finals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 82 |
Orlando Bennett leads with a GOAT score of 77.1 against 76.6 for Eilish McColgan — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McColgan scores higher on longevity. Bennett leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McColgan: 76.6, Bennett: 77.1.
Make your case for McColgan vs Bennett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.