Who is better, Antropova or Sokolova?
Ekaterina Antropova leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 86.0 for Lyubov Sokolova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ekaterina Antropova and Lyubov Sokolova level at 86.0. Ekaterina Antropova leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Lyubov Sokolova leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Antropova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Sokolova wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ekaterina-antropova-vs-lyubov-sokolova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Antropova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Antropova | 0 | 0 | 58 | 124 | 366 | 738 |
| 🇷🇺 Sokolova | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 346 | 718 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AntropovaActive | SokolovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| Nations League titles | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 2 | — |
| CEV Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 4 |
| Grand Prix titles | — | 2 |
| Years with the national team | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 82 |
Ekaterina Antropova leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 86.0 for Lyubov Sokolova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sokolova scores higher on longevity. Antropova leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Antropova: 86.0, Sokolova: 86.0.
Make your case for Antropova vs Sokolova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.