Who is better, Makarova or Courier?
Jim Courier leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.4 for Ekaterina Makarova — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jim Courier above Ekaterina Makarova: 83.6 vs 83.4. Jim Courier leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Ekaterina Makarova leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Courier wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Makarova wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ekaterina-makarova-vs-jim-courier
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Courier leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Makarova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 248 |
| 🇺🇸 Courier | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 686 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MakarovaRetired | CourierRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| WTA singles titles | 3 | — |
| Career high singles ranking | 8 | — |
| Grand Slam singles semi-finals | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 4 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 58 |
| Career singles titles | — | 23 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Major finals | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Jim Courier leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.4 for Ekaterina Makarova — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Makarova scores higher on statistics, longevity. Courier leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Makarova: 83.4, Courier: 83.6.
Make your case for Makarova vs Courier. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.