Who is better, El Guerrouj or Ewry?
Hicham El Guerrouj leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 88.9 for Ray Ewry — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hicham El Guerrouj above Ray Ewry: 89.1 vs 88.9. Hicham El Guerrouj leads on Longevity. Ray Ewry leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →El Guerrouj wins: Longevity
Ewry wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/el-guerrouj-vs-ray-ewry
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
El Guerrouj leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇦 El Guerrouj | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 212.37 | 1,251.86 |
| 🇺🇸 Ewry | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | El GuerroujRetired | EwryRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 4 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| 1500 m world record | 206 | — |
| Mile world record (s) | 223.13 | — |
| Undefeated 1500 m races | 86 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 8 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Individual Olympic finals won | — | 8 |
| World bests | — | 3 |
| US national titles | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Hicham El Guerrouj leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 88.9 for Ray Ewry — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ewry scores higher on peak, dominance. El Guerrouj leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. El Guerrouj: 89.1, Ewry: 88.9.
Make your case for El Guerrouj vs Ewry. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.