Who is better, electronic or tabseN?
Denis "electronic" Sharipov leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.2 for Johannes "tabseN" Wodarz — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Denis "electronic" Sharipov and Johannes "tabseN" Wodarz level at 86.2. Denis "electronic" Sharipov leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Johannes "tabseN" Wodarz leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →electronic wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
tabseN wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/electronic-cs-vs-es-tabsen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
electronic leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 electronic | 0 | 0 | 68 | 152 | 334 | 776 |
| 🇩🇪 tabseN | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 232 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | electronicActive | tabseNActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| Major MVP awards | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 6 | 1 |
| Big event titles | 15 | — |
| Professional seasons | 10 | — |
| Big tournament titles | — | 7 |
| Seasons played | — | 14 |
| Career maps played | — | 2,500 |
| Teams captained | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Denis "electronic" Sharipov leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.2 for Johannes "tabseN" Wodarz — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
tabseN scores higher on statistics, longevity. electronic leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. electronic: 86.2, tabseN: 86.2.
Make your case for electronic vs tabseN. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.