Who is better, electronic or Ruler?
Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Denis "electronic" Sharipov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk above Denis "electronic" Sharipov: 86.3 vs 86.2. Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk leads on Honours. Denis "electronic" Sharipov leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ruler wins: Honours
electronic wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/electronic-cs-vs-ruler-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ruler leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 electronic | 0 | 0 | 68 | 152 | 334 | 776 |
| 🇰🇷 Ruler | 0 | 0 | 70 | 166 | 336 | 774 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | electronicActive | RulerActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| Major MVP awards | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 6 | — |
| Big event titles | 15 | — |
| Professional seasons | 10 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 1 |
| LCK titles | — | 3 |
| LPL titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Park "Ruler" Jae-hyuk leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Denis "electronic" Sharipov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
electronic scores higher on statistics. Ruler leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. electronic: 86.2, Ruler: 86.3.
Make your case for electronic vs Ruler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.