Who is better, Baylor or Smith?
Elgin Baylor leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.2 for Katie Smith — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Elgin Baylor above Katie Smith: 85.3 vs 85.2. Elgin Baylor leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Katie Smith leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baylor wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Smith wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/elgin-baylor-vs-katie-smith
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baylor leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Baylor | 0 | 0 | 24.9 | 54.5 | 161.6 | 257.3 |
| 🇺🇸 Smith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.2 | 111.9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaylorRetired | SmithRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 11 | 7 |
| Career points | 23,149 | — |
| Points per game | 27.4 | — |
| Finals appearances | 8 | — |
| Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| All-NBA First Teams | 10 | — |
| WNBA titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| Career WNBA points | — | 6,452 |
| Seasons played | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Elgin Baylor leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.2 for Katie Smith — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Smith scores higher on honours, longevity. Baylor leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baylor: 85.3, Smith: 85.2.
Make your case for Baylor vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.