Who is better, Manning or Gradishar?
Randy Gradishar leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.3 for Eli Manning — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Randy Gradishar above Eli Manning: 83.5 vs 83.3. Randy Gradishar leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Eli Manning leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gradishar wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Manning wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/eli-manning-vs-randy-gradishar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gradishar leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Manning | 0 | 0 | 1,043 | 4,805 | 11,385 | 31,527 |
| 🇺🇸 Gradishar | 0 | 0 | 140 | 320 | 952 | 1,759 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ManningRetired | GradisharRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 2 | — |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Career passing yards | 57,023 | — |
| Career touchdown passes | 366 | — |
| Consecutive starts | 210 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Pro Bowls | — | 7 |
| Career tackles | — | 2,049 |
| Career interceptions | — | 20 |
| Seasons played | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Randy Gradishar leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.3 for Eli Manning — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Manning scores higher on honours, longevity. Gradishar leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Manning: 83.3, Gradishar: 83.5.
Make your case for Manning vs Gradishar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.