Who is better, Rubensson or Laudrup?
Elin Rubensson leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.7 for Michael Laudrup — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Elin Rubensson above Michael Laudrup: 80.8 vs 80.7. Elin Rubensson leads on Statistics, Honours. Michael Laudrup leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rubensson wins: Honours, Statistics
Laudrup wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/elin-rubensson-v-vs-michael-laudrup
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rubensson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Rubensson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 626 |
| 🇩🇰 Laudrup | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 68 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RubenssonActive | LaudrupRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Cup medals | 1 | — |
| Damallsvenskan titles | 4 | — |
| Sweden caps | 90 | — |
| Swedish cups | 3 | — |
| La Liga titles | — | 5 |
| European Cups | — | 1 |
| Serie A titles | — | 2 |
| Career goals | — | 175 |
| Denmark caps | — | 104 |
| Danish Player of the Year | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Elin Rubensson leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.7 for Michael Laudrup — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Laudrup scores higher on peak, dominance. Rubensson leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rubensson: 80.8, Laudrup: 80.7.
Make your case for Rubensson vs Laudrup. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.