GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Vines vs Hartley

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
VinesWinner
81.7

Vines wins: Dominance, Honours

Hartley
81.6

Hartley wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/ellsworth-vines-vs-john-hartley

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ellsworth Vines
81.7

Vines leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won three majors before dominating the professional tour of the 1930s.

1. Ellsworth Vines
81.7
2. John Hartley
81.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Ellsworth Vines5 seasons played · career day 1,825378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 John Hartley5 seasons played · career day 1,82514 titles
-96.3% vs Vines at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Vines0055120378685
🇬🇧 Hartley00451435

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricVinesRetiredHartleyRetired
Major singles titles3
US Championships titles2
Wimbledon titles12
World professional titles3
Years ranked world number one3
Wimbledon finals3
Consecutive titles2
Career years13
Wimbledon appearances6
Dominance w25%8478
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%6674
Honours w20%8480
Statistics w15%8286

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Vines81.7
Hartley81.6
The people
Vines
Hartley

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Vines vs Hartley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →