Who is better, Perry or Sthalekar?
Lisa Sthalekar leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.2 for Ellyse Perry — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lisa Sthalekar above Ellyse Perry: 88.3 vs 88.2. Lisa Sthalekar leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours. Ellyse Perry leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sthalekar wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Perry wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ellyse-perry-vs-lisa-sthalekar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sthalekar leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Perry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 314 |
| 🇦🇺 Sthalekar | 0 | 0 | 18 | 42 | 144 | 310 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PerryActive | SthalekarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 7 | 2 |
| International wickets | 300 | — |
| International runs | 7,000 | — |
| Test double centuries | 1 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year | 2 | — |
| Ashes series wins | 6 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| ODI wickets | — | 146 |
| ODI runs | — | 2,728 |
| ODI matches | — | 125 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
Lisa Sthalekar leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.2 for Ellyse Perry — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Perry scores higher on dominance, longevity. Sthalekar leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Perry: 88.2, Sthalekar: 88.3.
Make your case for Perry vs Sthalekar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.