Who is better, Perry or Taylor?
Ellyse Perry leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.1 for Ross Taylor — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ellyse Perry above Ross Taylor: 88.2 vs 88.1. Ellyse Perry leads on Honours, Dominance. Ross Taylor leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Perry wins: Dominance, Honours
Taylor wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ellyse-perry-vs-ross-taylor
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Perry leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Perry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 314 |
| 🇳🇿 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 158 | 404 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PerryActive | TaylorRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 7 | — |
| International wickets | 300 | — |
| International runs | 7,000 | — |
| Test double centuries | 1 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year | 2 | — |
| Ashes series wins | 6 | — |
| World Test Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Test runs | — | 7,683 |
| ODI runs | — | 8,607 |
| International centuries | — | 40 |
| ODI matches | — | 236 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 96 |
Ellyse Perry leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.1 for Ross Taylor — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Taylor scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Perry leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Perry: 88.2, Taylor: 88.1.
Make your case for Perry vs Taylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.