Who is better, Thomis or Videkull?
Élodie Thomis leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Lena Videkull — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Élodie Thomis and Lena Videkull level at 84.2. Élodie Thomis leads on Honours, Longevity. Lena Videkull leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thomis wins: Longevity, Honours
Videkull wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/elodie-thomis-v-vs-lena-videkull-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thomis leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Thomis | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 238 | 648 |
| 🇸🇪 Videkull | 0 | 0 | 52 | 111 | 329 | 665 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThomisRetired | VidekullRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 4 | — |
| French league titles | 11 | — |
| France caps | 141 | — |
| France goals | 30 | — |
| French cups | 5 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 123 |
| Sweden goals | — | 71 |
| World Cup appearances | — | 2 |
| Damallsvenskan titles | — | 3 |
| Damallsvenskan goals | — | 150 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 89 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Élodie Thomis leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Lena Videkull — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Videkull scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Thomis leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thomis: 84.2, Videkull: 84.2.
Make your case for Thomis vs Videkull. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.