GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Thomis vs Videkull

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ThomisWinner
84.2

Thomis wins: Longevity, Honours

Videkull
84.2

Videkull wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/elodie-thomis-v-vs-lena-videkull-v

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇫🇷 Élodie Thomis
84.2

Thomis leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Champions League winner with Lyon and a France tournament regular.

1. Élodie Thomis
84.2
2. Lena Videkull
84.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇸🇪 Lena Videkull5 seasons played · career day 1,825329 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Élodie Thomis5 seasons played · career day 1,826310 goals
-5.8% vs Videkull at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇫🇷 Thomis0052109238648
🇸🇪 Videkull0052111329665

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricThomisRetiredVidekullRetired
Champions League titles4
French league titles11
France caps141
France goals30
French cups5
Sweden caps123
Sweden goals71
World Cup appearances2
Damallsvenskan titles3
Damallsvenskan goals150
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%8889
Longevity w20%8280
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%8490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Thomis84.2
Videkull84.2
The people
Thomis
Videkull

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Thomis vs Videkull. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →