Who is better, Abeylegesse or Snell?
Elvan Abeylegesse leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.5 for Peter Snell — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Elvan Abeylegesse above Peter Snell: 84.6 vs 84.5. Elvan Abeylegesse leads on Longevity. Peter Snell leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Abeylegesse wins: Longevity
Snell wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/elvan-abeylegesse-vs-peter-snell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Abeylegesse leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇷 Abeylegesse | 0 | 0 | 45 | 107 | 373 | 653 |
| 🇳🇿 Snell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 50 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AbeylegesseRetired | SnellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records set | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| European Cross Country titles | 1 | — |
| Personal best 5000 metres in seconds | 872 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World records | — | 6 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 2 |
| 800m best (sec) | — | 104.3 |
| Mile best (sec) | — | 234.1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Elvan Abeylegesse leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.5 for Peter Snell — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Snell scores higher on dominance, honours. Abeylegesse leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Abeylegesse: 84.6, Snell: 84.5.
Make your case for Abeylegesse vs Snell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.