Who is better, Afrifa or Bailey-Cole?
Elvis Afrifa leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.6 for Ristananna Bailey-Cole — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Elvis Afrifa and Ristananna Bailey-Cole level at 76.6. Elvis Afrifa leads on Honours. Ristananna Bailey-Cole leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Afrifa wins: Honours
Bailey-Cole wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/elvis-afrifa-vs-ristananna-bailey-cole
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Afrifa leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Afrifa | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 670 |
| 🇯🇲 Bailey-Cole | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 671 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AfrifaActive | Bailey-ColeActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| World Relays medals | 1 | — |
| Dutch titles | 2 | — |
| Personal best 100 m (s) | 10.12 | — |
| NACAC medals | — | 1 |
| Jamaican championship medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 2 |
| Personal best (s) | — | 54.9 |
| NCAA All-America honours | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Elvis Afrifa leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.6 for Ristananna Bailey-Cole — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bailey-Cole scores higher on longevity. Afrifa leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Afrifa: 76.6, Bailey-Cole: 76.6.
Make your case for Afrifa vs Bailey-Cole. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.