Who is better, Emanuel or Chulak?
Emanuel Rego leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Yefim Chulak — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Emanuel Rego and Yefim Chulak level at 83.0. Emanuel Rego leads on Longevity. Yefim Chulak leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Emanuel wins: Longevity
Chulak wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/emanuel-rego-vs-yefim-chulak
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Emanuel leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Emanuel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 35 |
| 🇺🇦 Chulak | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 278 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EmanuelRetired | ChulakRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Tournament wins | 77 | — |
| World Tour titles | 8 | — |
| Years at top level | 23 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 3 |
| National team years | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Emanuel Rego leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Yefim Chulak — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chulak scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Emanuel leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Emanuel: 83.0, Chulak: 83.0.
Make your case for Emanuel vs Chulak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.