Who is better, Birarelli or Ebata?
Emanuele Birarelli leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Yukiko Ebata — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Emanuele Birarelli and Yukiko Ebata level at 81.9. Emanuele Birarelli leads on Longevity, Honours. Yukiko Ebata leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Birarelli wins: Longevity, Honours
Ebata wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/emanuele-birarelli-vs-yukiko-ebata
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Birarelli leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Birarelli | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 50 |
| 🇯🇵 Ebata | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 47 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BirarelliRetired | EbataActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 1 |
| World League titles | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 2 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 19 | — |
| World Grand Prix medals | — | 2 |
| Asian Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Japan caps | — | 250 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Emanuele Birarelli leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Yukiko Ebata — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ebata scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Birarelli leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Birarelli: 81.9, Ebata: 81.9.
Make your case for Birarelli vs Ebata. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.