Who is better, Bouchard or Fredrickson?
Émile Bouchard leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Frank Fredrickson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Émile Bouchard and Frank Fredrickson level at 87.0. Émile Bouchard leads on Longevity, Honours. Frank Fredrickson leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bouchard wins: Longevity, Honours
Fredrickson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/emile-bouchard-vs-frank-fredrickson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bouchard leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Bouchard | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 338 | 682 |
| 🇨🇦 Fredrickson | 0 | 0 | 60 | 156 | 331 | 671 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BouchardRetired | FredricksonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 4 | — |
| All-star selections | 4 | — |
| Games played | 785 | — |
| Career points | 193 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | 11 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Goals at the 1920 Olympics | — | 12 |
| Career NHL points | — | 78 |
| Western league scoring titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Émile Bouchard leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Frank Fredrickson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fredrickson scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Bouchard leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bouchard: 87.0, Fredrickson: 87.0.
Make your case for Bouchard vs Fredrickson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.