Who is better, Brembilla or Pan?
Emiliano Brembilla leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Pan Zhanle — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Emiliano Brembilla and Pan Zhanle level at 82.8. Emiliano Brembilla leads on Longevity, Statistics. Pan Zhanle leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brembilla wins: Longevity, Statistics
Pan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/emiliano-brembilla-vs-pan-zhanle
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brembilla leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Brembilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 689.5 | 1,597.8 |
| 🇨🇳 Pan | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrembillaRetired | PanActive |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World short-course golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic Games | 4 | — |
| 400 m freestyle best | 226.7 | — |
| Italian records | 5 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 3 |
| 100 m freestyle world record | — | 46.4 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Emiliano Brembilla leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Pan Zhanle — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pan scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Brembilla leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brembilla: 82.8, Pan: 82.8.
Make your case for Brembilla vs Pan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.