Who is better, Butragueño or El Khatib?
Emilio Butragueño leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Mahmoud El Khatib — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Emilio Butragueño and Mahmoud El Khatib level at 81.2. Emilio Butragueño leads on Honours. Mahmoud El Khatib leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Butragueño wins: Honours
El Khatib wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/emilio-butragueno-vs-mahmoud-el-khatib
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Butragueño leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Butragueño | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 55 | 105 |
| 🇪🇬 El Khatib | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 30 | 100 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ButragueñoRetired | El KhatibRetired |
|---|---|---|
| La Liga titles | 6 | — |
| UEFA Cup titles | 2 | — |
| Spain caps | 69 | — |
| Spain goals | 26 | — |
| La Liga goals | 123 | — |
| African Footballer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Africa Cup of Nations titles | — | 1 |
| Egyptian Premier League titles | — | 10 |
| Al Ahly goals | — | 108 |
| Egypt caps | — | 74 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 80 |
Emilio Butragueño leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Mahmoud El Khatib — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
El Khatib scores higher on longevity. Butragueño leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Butragueño: 81.2, El Khatib: 81.2.
Make your case for Butragueño vs El Khatib. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.