Who is better, Hughes or Renard?
Emlyn Hughes leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Wendie Renard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Hughes wins: Peak, Statistics
Renard wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/emlyn-hughes-vs-wendie-renard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hughes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Renard — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HughesRetired | RenardActive |
|---|---|---|
| First Division titles | 4 | — |
| European Cup titles | 2 | — |
| UEFA Cup titles | 2 | — |
| FA Cup titles | 1 | — |
| England caps | 62 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 8 |
| Division 1 Féminine titles | — | 16 |
| France caps | — | 168 |
| Career goals | — | 160 |
| Coupe de France titles | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 85 | 82 |
Emlyn Hughes leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Wendie Renard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Renard scores higher on longevity. Hughes leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hughes: 88.8, Renard: 88.7.
Make your case for Hughes vs Renard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.