Who is better, Eliasson or Horner?
Red Horner leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Emma Eliasson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Eliasson vs Horner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Red Horner above Emma Eliasson: 81.2 vs 81.1. Red Horner leads on Honours, Dominance. Emma Eliasson leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HornerWinner
81.2Horner wins: Dominance, Honours
Eliasson
81.1Eliasson wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/emma-eliasson-vs-red-horner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Red Horner
81.2
Horner leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Red Horner
2. Emma Eliasson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Red Horner5 seasons played · career day 1,826319 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Emma Eliasson5 seasons played · career day 2,55649 points
-84.6% vs Horner at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Eliasson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 72 |
| 🇨🇦 Horner | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 242 | 653 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Horner81.2
Eliasson81.1
FAQ
Where does Eliasson beat Horner?
Eliasson scores higher on peak, longevity. Horner leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Eliasson vs Horner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Eliasson: 81.1, Horner: 81.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Eliasson vs Horner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.