Who is better, McKeon or Belmonte?
Emma McKeon leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Mireia Belmonte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Emma McKeon and Mireia Belmonte level at 87.0. Emma McKeon leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Mireia Belmonte leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McKeon wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Belmonte wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/emma-mckeon-vs-mireia-belmonte
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McKeon leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 McKeon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 34 |
| 🇪🇸 Belmonte | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 37 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McKeonRetired | BelmonteActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 6 | 1 |
| Olympic medals | 14 | 4 |
| World Championship medals | 20 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 11 | — |
| 100m freestyle best (sec) | 51.96 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Short course world titles | — | 10 |
| European titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Emma McKeon leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 87.0 for Mireia Belmonte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Belmonte scores higher on longevity. McKeon leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McKeon: 87.0, Belmonte: 87.0.
Make your case for McKeon vs Belmonte. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.