Who is better, Navarro or Vondroušová?
Emma Navarro leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 76.9 for Markéta Vondroušová — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Emma Navarro above Markéta Vondroušová: 77.0 vs 76.9. Emma Navarro leads on Statistics, Longevity. Markéta Vondroušová leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Navarro wins: Longevity, Statistics
Vondroušová wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/emma-navarro-vs-marketa-vondrousova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Navarro leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Navarro | 0 | 0 | 220 | 370 | 421 | 421 |
| 🇨🇿 Vondroušová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NavarroActive | VondroušováActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam semi-finals | 1 | — |
| WTA singles titles | 1 | — |
| NCAA singles titles | 1 | — |
| Career high ranking | 8 | — |
| Grand Slam quarter-finals | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 3 |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 2 |
| Billie Jean King Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 80 |
Emma Navarro leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 76.9 for Markéta Vondroušová — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vondroušová scores higher on peak, honours. Navarro leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Navarro: 77.0, Vondroušová: 76.9.
Make your case for Navarro vs Vondroušová. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.