Who is better, Nuutinen or Näslund?
Emma Nuutinen leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 77.9 for Markus Näslund — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Emma Nuutinen above Markus Näslund: 78.1 vs 77.9. Emma Nuutinen leads on Honours, Statistics. Markus Näslund leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nuutinen wins: Honours, Statistics
Näslund wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/emma-nuutinen-vs-markus-naslund
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nuutinen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 Nuutinen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 84 |
| 🇸🇪 Näslund | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 270 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NuutinenActive | NäslundRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Olympic Games | 2 | — |
| NCAA seasons | 4 | — |
| International seasons | 12 | — |
| NHL points | — | 869 |
| NHL goals | — | 395 |
| Lester B. Pearson Awards | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 3 |
| Seasons as captain | — | 8 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Emma Nuutinen leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 77.9 for Markus Näslund — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Näslund scores higher on dominance, longevity. Nuutinen leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nuutinen: 78.1, Näslund: 77.9.
Make your case for Nuutinen vs Näslund. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.