Who is better, Bakewell or Pietersen?
Enid Bakewell leads with a GOAT score of 88.4 against 88.4 for Kevin Pietersen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bakewell vs Pietersen
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Enid Bakewell and Kevin Pietersen level at 88.4. Enid Bakewell leads on Honours. Kevin Pietersen leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BakewellWinner
88.4Bakewell wins: Honours
Pietersen
88.4Pietersen wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/enid-bakewell-vs-kevin-pietersen
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Enid Bakewell
88.4
Bakewell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Enid Bakewell
2. Kevin Pietersen
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Enid Bakewell5 years played · career day 2,556296 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Kevin Pietersen5 years played · career day 3,286248 runs
-16.2% vs Bakewell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bakewell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 170 | 398 |
| 🇬🇧 Pietersen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 248 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bakewell88.4
Pietersen88.4
FAQ
Where does Pietersen beat Bakewell?
Pietersen scores higher on peak. Bakewell leads on honours.
How is the Bakewell vs Pietersen score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bakewell: 88.4, Pietersen: 88.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bakewell vs Pietersen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.