Who is better, Brigitha or Larsson?
Enith Brigitha leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.6 for Gunnar Larsson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Enith Brigitha and Gunnar Larsson level at 81.6. Enith Brigitha leads on Longevity, Statistics. Gunnar Larsson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brigitha wins: Longevity, Statistics
Larsson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/enith-brigitha-vs-gunnar-larsson-swim
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brigitha leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Brigitha | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 48 |
| 🇸🇪 Larsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrigithaRetired | LarssonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| European titles | 4 | — |
| World records (short course) | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| European Championship golds | — | 4 |
| World records | — | 3 |
| Olympic finals | — | 4 |
| Swedish records | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Enith Brigitha leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.6 for Gunnar Larsson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Larsson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Brigitha leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brigitha: 81.6, Larsson: 81.6.
Make your case for Brigitha vs Larsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.