Who is better, Fonoimoana or Miljković?
Eric Fonoimoana leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.4 for Ivan Miljković — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Eric Fonoimoana above Ivan Miljković: 79.5 vs 79.4. Eric Fonoimoana leads on Peak. Ivan Miljković leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fonoimoana wins: Peak
Miljković wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/eric-fonoimoana-vs-ivan-miljkovic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fonoimoana leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Fonoimoana | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 238 | 668 |
| 🇷🇸 Miljković | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 42 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FonoimoanaRetired | MiljkovićRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| AVP tour wins | 5 | — |
| World Tour podiums | 6 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 1 | — |
| Years at the top level | 16 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World League titles | — | 2 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| MVP awards | — | 4 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Eric Fonoimoana leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.4 for Ivan Miljković — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Miljković scores higher on statistics, longevity. Fonoimoana leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fonoimoana: 79.5, Miljković: 79.4.
Make your case for Fonoimoana vs Miljković. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.