Who is better, Ericléia or León?
Wilfredo León leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 75.8 for Ericléia Bodziak — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wilfredo León above Ericléia Bodziak: 76.2 vs 75.8. Wilfredo León leads on Dominance, Statistics. Ericléia Bodziak leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →León wins: Dominance, Statistics
Ericléia wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ericleia-bodziak-vs-wilfredo-leon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
León leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Ericléia | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 266 | 686 |
| 🇵🇱 León | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 55 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EricléiaRetired | LeónActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 1 |
| World Grand Prix titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 2 | — |
| Years with the national team | 12 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 4 |
| Nations League medals | — | 3 |
| MVP awards | — | 5 |
| League titles | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 78 |
Wilfredo León leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 75.8 for Ericléia Bodziak — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ericléia scores higher on honours, longevity. León leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ericléia: 75.8, León: 76.2.
Make your case for Ericléia vs León. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.