GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Lindh vs Quadri

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LindhWinner
79.8

Lindh wins: Peak, Honours

Quadri
79.7

Quadri wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/erik-lindh-vs-aruna-quadri-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Erik Lindh
79.8

Lindh leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic singles bronze medallist in 1988 and a world team champion with Sweden.

1. Erik Lindh
79.8
2. Aruna Quadri
79.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇸🇪 Erik Lindh5 seasons played · career day 1,825352 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇬 Aruna Quadri5 seasons played · career day 1,825272 titles
-22.7% vs Lindh at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Lindh0052114352716
🇳🇬 Quadri004696272565

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLindhRetiredQuadriActive
Olympic medals1
World team titles3
European team titles4
Swedish national titles3
Years at the top level15
African Championship titles3
Olympic quarter-finals2
ITTF World Tour titles1
Career world ranking best13
All-Africa Games golds2
Dominance w25%7474
Peak w20%8684
Longevity w20%8084
Honours w20%8278
Statistics w15%7880

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Lindh79.8
Quadri79.7
The people
Lindh
Quadri

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Lindh vs Quadri. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →