Who is better, Morales or Hamed?
Erik Morales leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.8 for Naseem Hamed — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Morales vs Hamed
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Erik Morales and Naseem Hamed level at 83.8. Erik Morales leads on Longevity. Naseem Hamed leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MoralesWinner
83.8Morales wins: Longevity
Hamed
83.8Hamed wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/erik-morales-vs-naseem-hamed
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇲🇽 Erik Morales
83.8
Morales leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Erik Morales
2. Naseem Hamed
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Naseem Hamed5 years played · career day 1,826312 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇲🇽 Erik Morales5 years played · career day 2,19024 title wins
-92.3% vs Hamed at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Morales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 33 |
| 🏴 Hamed | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 232 | 641 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Morales83.8
Hamed83.8
FAQ
Where does Hamed beat Morales?
Hamed scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Morales leads on longevity.
How is the Morales vs Hamed score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Morales: 83.8, Hamed: 83.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Morales vs Hamed. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.