Who is better, Grahm or Ihatsu?
Marja-Leena Ihatsu leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.2 for Erika Grahm — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marja-Leena Ihatsu above Erika Grahm: 78.9 vs 78.2. Marja-Leena Ihatsu leads on Honours. Erika Grahm leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ihatsu wins: Honours
Grahm wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/erika-grahm-vs-marja-leena-ihatsu
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ihatsu leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Grahm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 155 |
| 🇫🇮 Ihatsu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 80 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrahmRetired | IhatsuRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| SDHL titles | 3 | — |
| Sweden caps | 120 | — |
| SDHL points | 250 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 5 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Finnish league titles | — | 5 |
| International seasons | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Marja-Leena Ihatsu leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.2 for Erika Grahm — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Grahm scores higher on peak, dominance. Ihatsu leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Grahm: 78.2, Ihatsu: 78.9.
Make your case for Grahm vs Ihatsu. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.