Who is better, Grahm or Näslund?
Erika Grahm leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 77.9 for Markus Näslund — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Erika Grahm above Markus Näslund: 78.2 vs 77.9. Erika Grahm leads on Peak, Statistics. Markus Näslund leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Grahm wins: Peak, Statistics
Näslund wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/erika-grahm-vs-markus-naslund
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Grahm leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Grahm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 155 |
| 🇸🇪 Näslund | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 270 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrahmRetired | NäslundRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic appearances | 2 | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| SDHL titles | 3 | — |
| Sweden caps | 120 | — |
| SDHL points | 250 | — |
| NHL points | — | 869 |
| NHL goals | — | 395 |
| Lester B. Pearson Awards | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 3 |
| Seasons as captain | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Erika Grahm leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 77.9 for Markus Näslund — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Näslund scores higher on longevity. Grahm leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Grahm: 78.2, Näslund: 77.9.
Make your case for Grahm vs Näslund. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.