Who is better, Holst or Forsberg?
Erika Holst leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Peter Forsberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Erika Holst and Peter Forsberg level at 83.1. Erika Holst leads on Longevity, Statistics. Peter Forsberg leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Holst wins: Longevity, Statistics
Forsberg wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/erika-holst-vs-forsberg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Holst leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Holst | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 94 |
| 🇸🇪 Forsberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 440 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HolstRetired | ForsbergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 5 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Sweden caps | 232 | — |
| Sweden career points | 150 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 1 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 885 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Erika Holst leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Peter Forsberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Forsberg scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Holst leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holst: 83.1, Forsberg: 83.1.
Make your case for Holst vs Forsberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.