Who is better, Holst or Toews?
Erika Holst leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Jonathan Toews — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Holst vs Toews
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Erika Holst and Jonathan Toews level at 83.1. Erika Holst leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Jonathan Toews leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HolstWinner
83.1Holst wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Toews
83.1Toews wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/erika-holst-vs-jonathan-toews
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Erika Holst
83.1
Holst leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Erika Holst
2. Jonathan Toews
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Jonathan Toews5 seasons played · career day 1,825324 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Erika Holst5 seasons played · career day 2,55660 points
-81.5% vs Toews at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Holst | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 94 |
| 🇨🇦 Toews | 0 | 0 | 54 | 123 | 324 | 564 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Holst83.1
Toews83.1
FAQ
Where does Toews beat Holst?
Toews scores higher on dominance, honours. Holst leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the Holst vs Toews score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holst: 83.1, Toews: 83.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Holst vs Toews. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.