Who is better, Holst or Tapani?
Erika Holst leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Susanna Tapani — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Holst vs Tapani
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Erika Holst and Susanna Tapani level at 83.1. Erika Holst leads on Longevity. Susanna Tapani leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HolstWinner
83.1Holst wins: Longevity
Tapani
83.1Tapani wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/erika-holst-vs-susanna-tapani
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Erika Holst
83.1
Holst leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Erika Holst
2. Susanna Tapani
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇫🇮 Susanna Tapani5 seasons played · career day 2,19073 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Erika Holst5 seasons played · career day 2,55660 points
-17.8% vs Tapani at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Holst | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 94 |
| 🇫🇮 Tapani | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 53 | 136 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Holst83.1
Tapani83.1
FAQ
Where does Tapani beat Holst?
Tapani scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Holst leads on longevity.
How is the Holst vs Tapani score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holst: 83.1, Tapani: 83.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Holst vs Tapani. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.