Who is better, Renshaw or Parker?
Ernest Renshaw leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.4 for Frank Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ernest Renshaw above Frank Parker: 85.5 vs 85.4. Ernest Renshaw leads on Dominance, Honours. Frank Parker leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Renshaw wins: Dominance, Honours
Parker wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ernest-renshaw-vs-frank-parker
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Renshaw leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Renshaw | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 234 | 653 |
| 🇺🇸 Parker | 0 | 0 | 35 | 76 | 174 | 515 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RenshawRetired | ParkerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Wimbledon singles titles | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | 5 | — |
| Wimbledon singles finals | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 14 | — |
| Irish Championships titles | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 4 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 4 |
| US Championships | — | 2 |
| French Championships | — | 2 |
| Years in the world top ten | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Ernest Renshaw leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.4 for Frank Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parker scores higher on longevity. Renshaw leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Renshaw: 85.5, Parker: 85.4.
Make your case for Renshaw vs Parker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.