Who is better, Nevers or Lott?
Ernie Nevers leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 85.9 for Ronnie Lott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ernie Nevers above Ronnie Lott: 86.0 vs 85.9. Ernie Nevers leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Ronnie Lott leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nevers wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Lott wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ernie-nevers-vs-ronnie-lott
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nevers leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Nevers | 0 | 0 | 55 | 125 | 380 | 425 |
| 🇺🇸 Lott | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 23 | 48 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NeversRetired | LottRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Points in one game | 40 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 5 | — |
| Career touchdowns | 38 | — |
| Seasons played | 5 | — |
| Points in 1929 | 85 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 4 |
| Pro Bowls | — | 10 |
| Interceptions | — | 63 |
| All-Pro First Teams | — | 6 |
| Defensive touchdowns | — | 9 |
| Career tackles | — | 1,146 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Ernie Nevers leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 85.9 for Ronnie Lott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lott scores higher on honours, longevity. Nevers leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nevers: 86.0, Lott: 85.9.
Make your case for Nevers vs Lott. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.