Who is better, Parker or Davidson?
Sven Davidson leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 75.3 for Ernie Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sven Davidson above Ernie Parker: 75.4 vs 75.3. Sven Davidson leads on Longevity, Honours. Ernie Parker leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Davidson wins: Longevity, Honours
Parker wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ernie-parker-vs-sven-davidson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Davidson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Parker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 30 |
| 🇸🇪 Davidson | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 286 | 626 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParkerRetired | DavidsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| State championship titles | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 1 | — |
| Career years | 9 | — |
| Australasian Championships played | 4 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 1 |
| Major singles finals | — | 3 |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | — | 1 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 3 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 74 |
Sven Davidson leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 75.3 for Ernie Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parker scores higher on peak, statistics. Davidson leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parker: 75.3, Davidson: 75.4.
Make your case for Parker vs Davidson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.