Who is better, Parker or Hamilton?
Willoughby Hamilton leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 75.3 for Ernie Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willoughby Hamilton above Ernie Parker: 75.4 vs 75.3. Willoughby Hamilton leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Ernie Parker leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hamilton wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Parker wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ernie-parker-vs-willoughby-hamilton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hamilton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Parker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 30 |
| 🇮🇪 Hamilton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParkerRetired | HamiltonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| State championship titles | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 1 | — |
| Career years | 9 | — |
| Australasian Championships played | 4 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| Irish Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| Career span in years | — | 10 |
| Wimbledon finals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Willoughby Hamilton leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 75.3 for Ernie Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parker scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hamilton leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parker: 75.3, Hamilton: 75.4.
Make your case for Parker vs Hamilton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.