Who is better, Aleksib or Yatoro?
Aleksi "Aleksib" Virolainen leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Aleksi "Aleksib" Virolainen above Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk: 87.0 vs 86.8. Aleksi "Aleksib" Virolainen leads on Longevity. Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Aleksib wins: Longevity
Yatoro wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-aleksib-vs-yatoro-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Aleksib leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 Aleksib | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 307 | 653 |
| 🇺🇦 Yatoro | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 432 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AleksibActive | YatoroActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 10 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 11 | — |
| Teams captained | 4 | — |
| The International titles | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| The International MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 7 |
| Professional seasons | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Aleksi "Aleksib" Virolainen leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Yatoro scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Aleksib leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Aleksib: 87.0, Yatoro: 86.8.
Make your case for Aleksib vs Yatoro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.