Who is better, allu or pashaBiceps?
Aleksi "allu" Jalli leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.4 for Jarosław "pashaBiceps" Jarząbkowski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Aleksi "allu" Jalli above Jarosław "pashaBiceps" Jarząbkowski: 83.5 vs 83.4. Aleksi "allu" Jalli leads on Statistics, Longevity. Jarosław "pashaBiceps" Jarząbkowski leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →allu wins: Longevity, Statistics
pashaBiceps wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-allu-vs-pashabiceps-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
allu leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 allu | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 236 | 662 |
| 🇵🇱 pashaBiceps | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 248 | 686 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | alluActive | pashaBicepsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major finals | 1 | 2 |
| Big tournament titles | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 1 | 3 |
| Career maps played | 1,900 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| Big event titles | — | 10 |
| Professional seasons | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Aleksi "allu" Jalli leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.4 for Jarosław "pashaBiceps" Jarząbkowski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
pashaBiceps scores higher on peak, honours. allu leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. allu: 83.5, pashaBiceps: 83.4.
Make your case for allu vs pashaBiceps. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.