GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ame vs Harvey

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AmeWinner
87.3

Ame wins: Statistics

Harvey
87.3

Harvey wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Esports

Shareable URL · /compare/es-ame-vs-stephanie-harvey-cs

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wang "Ame" Chunyu
87.3

Ame leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Two-time International finalist and one of China's premier carries.

1. Wang "Ame" Chunyu
87.3
2. Stephanie Harvey
87.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Trophies per season

Career timeline · Trophies per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through split year 5 · Trophies per season
1. 🇨🇳 Wang "Ame" Chunyu5 split years played · career day 1,826396 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Stephanie Harvey5 split years played · career day 1,825332 trophies
-16.2% vs Ame at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Ame0055124302748
🇨🇦 Harvey0055116332688

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAmeActiveHarveyRetired
The International finals2
Major titles3
The International top-four finishes3
Seasons played9
Career prize money in millions3
Women's world championships5
ESWC titles5
Premier tournament wins15
Seasons active14
Team captaincies4
Dominance w25%8686
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%8286
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%9284

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ame87.3
Harvey87.3
The people
Ame
Harvey

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ame vs Harvey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →